I would think it would include maturity. It's obvious that my point was missed.
Training and education in preparation for marriage is a part of learning about life. If done properly at an early age and nurtured by parents who understand this can help their children develop into very mature responsible teens unlike the majority of those in our society today. In fact, i don't think I mentioned anything about dating, but when the do start to date, they will have a very strong foundation. My statement about "limited adult responsibilities" covers a wide range of issues.
To isolate ones thoughts to one specific issue in dealing with our youth is not always wise. In recent weeks, I have had the opportunity to get to spend a lot of time talking with various Catholic homeschool families in my community about things such as when a teen should be allowed to start dating, whether they should "date" at all some preferring to substitute dating for a similar but different idea of "courtship" and how much exposure a teen ought to have to members of the opposite sex.
As a homeschooling parent and father of girls, these issues affect me in a very personal level. I generally support homeschoolers in all that they do. God knows I would never entrust my kids' upbringing to the choas in the public schools, where they will be taught to denigrate Christianity, admire Mohammed and learn vice from an early age.
For many homeschooling parents, the decision to keep kids home reflects a disillusionment with the system of public education, not only with regards to curriculum, but especially in the area of morality and ethics.
Homeschoolers are just as concerned that their children will be exposed to bad kids as they are that they will be exposed to bad teaching. In the public schools, lack of adequate supervision and discipline, coupled with a secular mindset, peer pressure and an infatuation with pop culture tends to sexualize our children and introduce them to sexuality and sexual activity well before and outside of marriage. I sympathize with these concerns greatly, but I have noticed in homeschooling families the tendency to react to these conditions by taking the approach that their kids will not be allowed to investigate the opposite sex at all until they are at adult age.
So, for example, if in public school kids are starting to date and have sex at age 15 or 16, then the homeschool solution is to just keep their kids away from dating or from the opposite sex in general until they are at least 18 or The rationale for this is that kids of this age are far too young to be thinking about relationships and that it is best to keep them away from any type of dating or courtship until they are legal adults.
The core idea is a reaction against making kids grow up too fast. Furthermore, this idea is put forth as if it were "traditional" morality.
I think it is admirable to want to protect kids from impurity, but I disgaree with the premise that we don't want to make kids grow up too fast. As a matter of fact, I think in our culture kids are forced to grow up too slow. Kids are subject to something called "infantilization," which means an artificial extension of childhood. This means that they are treated as children while they are biologically adults, which leads to role confusion and teen angst as teens question their place.
You went right from childhood into adulthood.
You could pinpoint the day you became a man. Contrast this with our culture, where kids come of age through a long, drawn out and indeterminate period of time known as "adolescence" which can begin as early as 12 and go on into the 20's. A child is regarded as an adult as soon as he passes puberty, and usually the new adults rise to the challenge and take on adult responsibilities with vigor and success online source. It is only in modern culture that adulthood is postponed until 18 or 21, that childhood is drawn out, and that teen angst develops.
Given this fact, the reality is that traditionally, kids are introduced to courtship and sexuality earlier than in modern America, the only difference being that it is done within the context of courtship, betrothal and marriage. A girl is marriable at 14, a boy at In many cultures, a girl not married by 21 was considered an old maid.
It was something deep and hard-wired. You can use these HTML tags. As a homeschooling parent and father of girls, these issues affect me in a very personal level. Sharing lesson time can be good for homeschooled students for another reason: Master falling in with the homeschool dates, meetings, ivy tech offers an alternative online dating naked.
How does this relate back to the homeschooling issue? Well, it means this: If we really wanted to adopt "traditional" morals, we would be encouraging our kids to think about marriage at age 12 or 13, to get betrothed at 14 and married at But many parents recoil with horror at the idea that their kids be involved with the opposite sex at so young an age. What is my point in all this? I am certainly not suggesting that we start marrying our kids at age 14, nor I am suggesting we adopt the public school "kids will be kids" permissiveness.
I am simply pointing out that when we decide to keep our kids away from dating until they are 19, let's not pretend that we are being traditional. This post contains affiliate links.
Any purchases thru the links will pay me a small commission. Do you struggle with coming up with ideas for date night?
End up doing the same thing every time you go out? Or just not going at all?
Did you wind up talking about the kids, again? My favorite idea so far is the progressive dinner out. You start at one restaurant for appetizers, then go to another for main course and finish with dessert at a third. I like the adventure of not planning out the route ahead of time. This idea came in handy while I was visiting my daughter at college. I got cool mom points for it!